@choess, all your work curating taxa is a huge help.
Branches of the tree should only be ‘locked up’ (ie has a curated Taxon Frameworks) if every taxon is already added.
This means the work to be done is not longer grafting taxa (which as you say curators who aren’t Taxon Curators can’t do in these cases) but making Taxon Changes which non-Taxon Curator curators can do.
For example, trying to graft Luscinia cyanura says ‘destination covered by curated taxon framework’
According to Wikipedia, this is a synonym for Red-flanked bluetail (Tarsiger cyanurus) which is the name iNaturalist uses.
In these cases, rather click the ‘Add Taxon Change’ button and any curator should be able to create and commit a Taxon Change like the following. If you can’t there’s a bug and please report.
There are Taxon Frameworks for some groups like Mantids where perhaps the External Reference (in this case Mantid Species File) isn’t adequate and there are too many ‘legit taxa’ being observed and imported that aren’t in the External Reference that the Taxon Framework might be causing more harm (ie bottlenecking grafting) than good (ie preventing duplicate taxa). In these cases the Taxon Framework should probably be removed.
But for most of the branches with Taxon Frameworks (e.g. mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, etc.) I’d argue that at least 9 out of 10 ungrafted taxa relevant to these groups should not be grafted and rather should be swapped into an existing grafted active taxon. If you’re getting a different sense of this proportion, maybe I’m not following this carefully enough and should do an assessment. Also, I’m not meaning to be the sole Taxon Curator for so many groups, thats meant to be a temporary situation while we get the bugs out and recruit/train more Taxon Curators. If anyone would like to try being a Taxon Curator for a certain group who already has a lot of experience being a curator please let me know and I’ll try to go over some of the Taxon Framework features I’m still trying to properly document.
The one group that is throwing this system off are ‘long extinct taxa’ like this fossil Kangaroo Macropus goliah that just got imported. Any curator can add an ‘extinct conservation status’ so we can at least track this as extinct. But it is true that only a Taxon Curator can graft them to the tree. Its a real pain to figure out how to make an exception for extinct taxa that I haven’t got around too. But since extinct taxa are basically unbounded (ie there’s literally thousands of fossil mammals we haven’t yet added to our ‘complete’ tree) and they don’t really have anything to do with the core of iNaturalist which is observing living things, I question whether we really need to be grafting these nodes. My preference would be for curators to rather make these extinct taxa inactive and leave them ungrafted, which any curator can do (at least for the vast majority of these where there are no observations). Curious what you think about all of this.