- Yes
- No
- Maybe
0 voters
0 voters
Should probably be a third option: Undetermined or Don’t Know. I’m very dubious it still exists based on available evidence but leave open the small possibility it might.
You are right added a third option.
I vote no, with the full understanding that it is easier to prove that something exists as opposed to not existing. But considering that the last study claimed that they found a possible nesting site with their bigfoot trail cameras and no one in the study thought it would be a good idea to mosey on over with a Canon, suggests to me that they didn’t fully believe it themselves.
Almost certainly not, but I wish that it did still exist. The news and excitement would lead to increased habitat conservation and other good stuff.
Most likely not, unfortunately. I would love to be proven wrong by a rediscovery, but I’m not getting my hopes up.
I have a stuck feeling that it might still exist, but I’m also aware that very likely not.
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.