Dual IDs, negative IDs, and making leaving it at the genus level feel better

[aaravmishra]

@spiphany

There are lots of filters in Identify and many more if you are willing to use URL manipulation.
The filters for “disagreement” and sort by “random”, non-RG should perform the functions you want.

Atleast they should be in the interface and not just in URLs, that would be an improvement.

@spiphany

If you read the responses to your thread with an open mind instead of deciding that anyone who doesn’t agree with you is attacking you, you will see that there are a variety of attitudes towards guides and people who prefer other solutions because the feature as it currently exists does not meet their needs.

They prefer other solutions because iNat has not worked up guides, and many of them may not even be aware of its functionality.

@spiphany

I would also gently suggest that your frustration about guides is off-topic for this thread

If people without any guidance make ids, you can expect the downsides to be discussed. That is where guides some in. Still, I will keep it off this topic for now as you have said.

Also I wish I could flag CVM’s that produce large amounts for misidentifications for re-evaluation. That would be necessary.