re: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43048348 (and similarly for https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43065926 ) The following IDs are posted: [Family Lycaenidae] [Complex Leptotes pirithous] [Complex Leptotes pirithous] [Complex Leptotes pirithous] So simply, 1 ID to family, followe…

This should now be fixed - let us know if you see any more issues and thanks for reporting this bug https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43048348 [Screenshot 2025-12-16 at 5.02.17 PM] [Screenshot 2025-12-16 at 5.02.09 PM]

Seems like this is more generic than just complexes. Have just seen the same for a section. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/317484539 [image]

I suspect it is in fact related to recent changes in the community taxon calculation – however, not this most recent change but the previous one . My guess is that whatever changes were made also involved redefining “disagreements” so that in some cases broader IDs are displayed as though they were …

But if they are a disagreement, they should apply to the leaf taxon as well, not just the intermediate ones … And in the two examples above, the community and observation IDs at all the levels are the same.

Ether the algorithm arithmetic is wrong, or the display is wrong. I see that so often, that I ignore the discrepancy. 4 out of 4, but all 4 do not exist.

I didn’t say they were disagreements or that they should be called this. I also noted that I don’t completely understand what is going on. I said that for some reason iNat seems to be labeling these IDs as disagreements under certain circumstances – I think it is basically any ID that is broader th…

I agree there seems to be an error here - we are looking into it and will report back

It’s probably not a very helpful data point for debugging, but I’ve seem similar Algorithm Summaries for a lot of observations recently. The pattern appears to be that the observation has an accurate score > 0.67 at the CID rank, but lower, inaccurate scores (often below 0.67) for some higher ranks. …

Thanks for reporting this. I found two bugs in the Display of the Community Taxon (not the actual behind the scenes calculation) and took a first pass at a fix that looks promising - we’ll aim to deploy early next week. [Screenshot 2025-12-12 at 10.37.06 PM] [Screenshot 2025-12-12 at 10.37.16 PM…

Error in Community Algorithm Count for Species Complexes

Bug Reports

Topic		Replies	Views
Obs has 0.8 support for species ID but community and observation IDs stuck at genus level Bug Reports	14	551	June 8, 2021
Identifying Complex does not allow a disagreement with species within complex Bug Reports	13	821	July 24, 2024
ID is red in Community Taxon section but is not a disagreement Bug Reports web	16	1178	January 31, 2026
Species complexes and disagreeing IDs - not always automatically "precise" Bug Reports	3	157	September 30, 2025
Seemingly identical identification disagreements have different community taxon outcomes Bug Reports	7	468	August 30, 2021

Error in Community Algorithm Count for Species Complexes

Related topics