Objection noted, and fair point that I could have done more to communicate about the need for the move - I will try to do better next time. By the time I saw the string of 10 replies discussing details of how CV implementation could be improved (for new users and others), it seemed like a productive discussion for this topic, or maybe for a feature request, but was veering away from the OP of “Should There Be More Reward Mechanisms for Identifiers?” There were (and still are) excellent earlier posts in that topic by you and others expressing the point that CV improvements would be one way to reward identifiers. But a detailed discussion of what those improvements should or shouldn’t be was best continued in a different topic.
Again, apologies if the abruptness of the move might have seemed punitive - the intent was rather to help a productive discussion continue in a more fitting context, and help prevent the other topic from veering in a different direction.