Unsure about this, not sure however if it is bad as an orchid genus (Aa) being named to come first in the dictionary…
If so, I actually would call that a descriptive name. Future generations will not remember the specific personage of Lady Gaga, but they will certainly understand the reference to a flamboyant entertainer, because flamboyant entertainers are a recurring phenomenon.
3 Likes
In the US birding world, honorific names are being removed by naming authorities. This may reflect and contribute to the wider societal trend to address institutional racism. Most birds here were named after the white colonial males who discovered them or provided a sample. Many of them were outspoken white supremacists (see https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/08/04/american-bird-names-colonialism-audubon/?arc404=true), and the movement is to not honor their names in perpetuity for fear of endorsing their ideas. Proponents of name changes understand changing species names alone does not end racism, but it is part of a wider context of anti-racism.
For Greta Thunberg and Lady Gaga and the like, maybe it is how future generations view them that may determine whether or not species continue to carry their names.
3 Likes
Of course, the scientific names will live on, whether or not the common names are retained – even if only as junior synonyms in future taxonomies – and regardless of the eponymous person’s reputation. Most likely the controversies surrounding most eponyms will be as forgotten someday as the person for which the organism was named.
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.