Well I’d recommend not uploading any North American Bombus. There are several of us that take a fine tooth comb to those observations, but is it really a bad thing to have 2, 3, or 4 people who all have a certain level of expertise helping to ensure that the observation is correctly ID’d? Have you gone and read the profiles of these “identification farmers”? You may find that some of these are specialists.
neylon
10
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why do some observation receive plenty of agreeing IDs? | 149 | 5672 | February 7, 2023 | |
| People identifying sightings identified previously when it is unnecessary | 101 | 3810 | April 27, 2026 | |
| Why some people insist on repeating giving ID under an observation of an obvious species? | 84 | 4139 | April 25, 2021 | |
| Adding unnecessary identifications to unique observations? | 43 | 1343 | January 6, 2025 | |
| Crazy prolific but incorrect identifier | 74 | 5598 | December 8, 2020 |