Here a better illustration:
My friend graciously offers to help me with my dishes, but when they do, they only wash half of each dish. When questioned about this, they say “you should be grateful for any amount of help I provide.” It would obviously be way better if my friend washed half the dishes fully instead of half of all the dishes. So if you are going to review observations, do so fully. Reviewing half as many observations the right way is better than leaving twice as many “half washed”.
Additionally, because you are proposing a large-scale change to the platform, it’s like my friend saying, “you should just purchase and install a dishwasher so it’s easier for me when I offer to help wash your dishes.”
I’m uncertain if you are reviewing ficus observations to use for your research, or if you are doing it because you enjoy reviewing them outside of work purposes. If the former is true, then the litter example especially doesn’t hold true, because you are receiving a “service” in return, and essentially you come off as “I expect maximum effort on others’ part in exchange from minimum effort on my part.” If the latter is true…