LGBTQIA+ and iNaturalist

I wanted that suit too!! It seemed so supportive (fabric wise) and a bit more modest than the typical fare :(

2 Likes

This thread has turned a bit controversial.
It is hard to know how I feel about all the posts, mostly because I think (or maybe I want to think) that most people are trying their hardest to be respectful, so I don’t want to get too mad at someone, especially since misunderstandings happen easily on the internet. Maybe it’s just hard to tell the intent of someone without knowing them and talking to them face-to-face. People have strong emotions and feelings about this topic.


I do know that being misgendered is not pleasent. When I (a cis-gender person) was a young tween, I got a pixie cut and loved it. A lot of my favorite Studio Ghibli characters had short hair, and I wanted mine like that too. I got called a boy a lot and it annoyed me so much. (nothing wrong with he/him pronouns, but they aren’t what I choose to go by, so it upset me. One person was a little kid, so I guess they didn’t know any better) I have not been misgendered a lot, but I do know how it feels, and I can imagine it’s harder for others who have it happen to them more frequently.

Intentionally misgendering someone is bullying. Because when someone asks you not to do a thing to them, and you do it anyway, that is bullying. verbally or physically, bullying hurts, and I don’t think that hurting people is the intention of this thread.

I myself have misgendered people before, and I think it’s just going to happen sometimes when you meet new people. People just don’t think sometimes, and stumble with words. It’s embarrassing, but then it’s your job to decide what to do next when corrected or told straightforeward that you were being rude. In my experience, if one of my friends corrects someone about their pronouns, the person apologizes, and my friends tell them it’s alright and we move on with the conversation. Maybe sometimes it’s best, when apologizing to someone, not to get too wordy or ramble on. Hopefully I make sense. @walks-the-ages does a better job explaining a lot of this, basically:


I am glad that iNatters are able to bond over similarities, and I am glad that there are so many projects for different people. I am glad to learn how I can be more respectful too. Thank you to @walks-the-ages and @astra_the_dragon for your well written posts. Neopronouns and their pronunciations have confused me for a bit, someone wrote how to pronounce them and use them, I can’t find that post but thank you for that! I certainly learned a lot from that post especially :-)


No-one deserves abusive words. @nonbinary-naturalist, I am so sorry you had to deal with that, and be told that by so many people, especially the adults that are supposed to guide and encourage children. I am glad you found the pronouns you like, and I hope you have found people who love and accept you for who you are. Everyone deserves respect and acception, no matter what.

On using it/its, I can understand not wanting to be rude by using it, and I understand that people use those pronouns in a derogatory way sometimes. And I understand that for older people it’s hard to get out of that mindset, and many other mindets that are so ingrained. However, like @nonbinary-naturalist put it, it can be worse refusing to use the prefered set of pronouns a person has, even if you do mean well:


Hopefully I wrote this post in a way that was respectful to everyone, and especially the naturalists I tagged. If I mis-interpreted anything I quoted from you, let me know, please. Again, everyone’s always learning, and everyone’s at least a bit socially awkward. I know I can be!

13 Likes

Hi there, and thank you for your thoughts. I do want to note that we are trying to steer the conversation in another direction for now, since that sub-conversation has been pretty thoroughly covered.

I’ve been enjoying the blog posts from @tiwane covering LGBTQ iNatters. It’s a pleasant surprise to find out that people I’ve seen out and about identifying and observing are also members of the queer community!

4 Likes

Thanks for telling me, I did not know that.

4 Likes

Not everybody has them, but everybody should

2 Likes

We (the iNat staff members of the Community Circle—me, Tony, Scott, and Ken-ichi) want to briefly return to the topic of pronouns and gender and to apologize for our missteps there. We’ve learned a lot from this conversation and we have updated the Community Guidelines to clarify that everyone’s stated pronouns should be respected. Comments that state otherwise will be hidden or removed. We also have existing community guidelines that prohibit attacking other users. We will hide posts and may suspend users who violate this or other standards in the forum guidelines.

iNat platforms should be welcoming spaces for all users. We appreciate the emotional labor from many in the community who helped us understand how to do better. Pride Month is a period when showing extra support for the LGBTQIA+ community is a priority, and our decisions did not align with that.

So, in short, we got this one wrong. We apologize to nonbinary-naturalist and anyone else who was hurt by us allowing misgendering posts to stay up. We have modified the Community Guidelines to prevent it from happening again. We will continue educating ourselves and our moderators on these topics.

Thank you to everyone who has shown us and others on this thread patience and grace over the last few weeks.

28 Likes

This, is why I stay here, in iNat! :blue_heart: :blue_heart: :blue_heart:

1 Like

2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Moderation decisions about several posts in the LGBTQIA+ Thread

Thank you for your reply. I appreciate the step forward.

While it is a step forward that finally, after three-plus weeks of asking, there is a rule protecting our pronoun use, the rest of new guidelines show that the Staff still fails to recognise the reasons behind all this. The inherent core issues, if you will. When lgbtqia+ people are tone policed and treated as if standing up for ourselves is just as bad as those acting in bigoted manner, it still denies our personhood and our agency.

Considering the new guidelines as written have bolstered the Staff as being correct in their treatment of us in our reaction to the transmisia, unfortunately ultimately means the apology is lipservice because when something comes up (not just for lgbtqia+, but race, or other things as well!) in the future the same will repeat. Change needs to occur so things do not repeat.

The rule that our pronouns must be used is great, I really do appreciate that. It is a step forward, and if this were 3 weeks ago when first pointed out, this would have solved it! Unfortunately, this is no longer just the original incident, it is also the actions of the Staff in the following weeks which has showcased this much deeper issue. I am glad Staff has realized they got it wrong, but I fail to see any understanding of how wrong, based on reading the actual text of the new guidelines, and the lack of apology for how we were treated by Staff - not just the act of misgendering (which Staff now has apologized for - thank you) but in the actions the Staff took to prevent us from defending ourselves when it became clear that our many calm extremely well written extremely detailed posts were ignored. Or, for example, even some outright support of transmisic posts (shown by Staff likes of said posts).

There are these deep ingrained issues that require addressing, that the writing of the new guidelines defends & protects the Staff from actually addressing. The use-correct-pronoun issue is solved. The circumstances and guidelines that allowed the issue in the first place, is not.

Without fixing the core of the problems, the problem still exists, it will just pop up in another way next time. It won’t be pronouns thanks to the new rule, but it will be something else. The goal, I believe, should be to prevent that next time all together.

9 Likes

Not just the staff. I was accused of “aggression” and “not helping the conversation” for defining what the rage and controversy was about, since that seemed to have gotten lost in the boiling emotions. It was not a staffer or a mod who accused me.

Well, maybe our experiences with queerness and nature. But the moving of yet another post into a thread that is already closed shows that discussing certain aspects of our experience with queerness and iNat is still not welcome here.

6 Likes

Sorry, we got our wires crossed about moving the last two posts. I’ve brought them back here.

6 Likes

Thank you for your kind response, especially this part:

I don’t expect everyone to suddenly become perfectly happy with the concept of it/its pronouns, but I do expect that they will gender me correctly regardless of their personal feelings.

It’s not a problem if someone feels uncomfortable using it/its pronouns for me or anyone else. It becomes a problem when they weaponize their discomfort to misgender me.

And since it’s probably been lost in the long thread now, if you (or anyone else reading this) would like to get more practice at using neopronouns, I am in the middle (Actually, literally the middle now! 50/101!) of writing a collection of short stories, each one using a new set of pronouns, with short tutorials at the beginning to show how to use them.

You can read the short stories as they are written here: neopronouns-in-action.tumblr.com

And you can read a now slightly out of date version here on the web archive, which comes with a free audio book version…(though now that I think of it I’m not sure how well the audio pronounces the neopronouns…okay no I checked, it does do pretty okay lol. Oh no wait. It pronounced “vi” as “six” because of Roman numerals.) here.

When I finish writing all 101 stories, the whole book will be free to download from the web archive, and you’ll be able to buy a physical copy from whichever print-on-demand site I figure out works best.

Thank you again for your kind words and response, you are a great ally :)

12 Likes

Thank you.

I really do hope you’ll take at least a small look at the additional aspect i am concerned about, where moderation focuses on ending conflict sometimes by threatening consequences for BOTH people if there is a conflict. While I don’t feel that users on iNat are usually outwardly malicious, it really is true that sometimes someone is wrong, and the other person isn’t. The ‘both sides’ approach really empowers bullies, abusers, and just fails to encourage better behavior. @sunguramy calling out tone policing is really on point here. I know it’s been really hurtful to me when that happened to me, and it can be downright dangerous when it is directed at multiply marginalized groups like trans people. I hope this is a step forward… but please remember, sometimes one person is just in the wrong.

There’s a disproportionate number of LGBT, neurodivergent, and other underrepresented people on iNat. I know it often doesn’t go smoothly when a lot of people with a lot of trauma or past history of being abused come together. But honestly, a lot of us are just tired of the common abuse tactics like ‘both sides’-ism. A common type of abuse directed towards autistic people is making us upset or triggering autistic meltdown behaviors with known triggers, then shaming us for being upset or dysregulated by the toxic treatment. I saw that happening in this thread to people (at least one of whom said they are autistic), not as intentional abuse, but no doubt as part of a pattern that person has experienced before… I am tired of this stuff and i just have absolutely zero tolerance for it any more. You’re in an important role where you provide a community for a lot of people who can’t find it elsewhere. Please protect it instead of turning this place (more) toxic as well.

15 Likes

To the iNaturalist staff:

  1. Please actually read this post
  2. Set a ten minute timer
  3. Play with a stress ball or look at cute pictures of kittens while you wait for the timer to be up
  4. Read this post again

Sigh. There’s a lot that needs to be said here. I had to break my boycott of iNaturalist to see your updates to the community guidelines, and…

Sigh.

I think it would benefit everyone here if staff would list out, in bullet point by bullet point, what exactly it is you’re apologizing for. Just so it’s clear to everyone what you think you got wrong.

I’m serious.

Because I read the new community guidelines, and it is clear you still do not understand what the problem with your reaction a here, as paid staff members.

Most of what has been added accomplishes nothing but further defend the actions that you, the paid staff, took during this incident.

You are still equating telling people not to be bigoted with attacking other users. You are still showing everyone that you believe criticizing bigotry, and asking people not to be bigoted towards you, is more offensive and aggressive than being bigoted in the first place.

forum mod Astra_the_dragon has done nothing but slander me throughout this incident, as have the paid staff, pretending that I am being unreasonable and demanding that, and I quote, “everyone be perfect all the time”.

Astra has repeatedly spoken directly over me and decided that because he is okay with being misgendered, then all trans people must be okay with being misgendered, pretending that the situation is about some hypothetical trans person as though I’ve not been here the entire time I was allowed to be, still defending myself tooth and nail to receive the most basic respect.

But somehow, my posts where I demand he stop speaking over me and saying I must accept being misgendered were considered a “personal attack” that is too inappropriate for the forums, but not the ones where he claims I’m being irrational and need to just let people misgender me.

You are now claiming you understand you were wrong, but you’ve done nothing to prove that, all your actions show that you still believe you were right. This is, as the kids call it, lip service.

If you all know you were wrong, then why has “do not bring up the same argument repeatedly” been added to the official community guidelines?

The only “argument” being brought up repeatedly…was the fact that you were all still being bigoted, and refusing to listen to the marginalized people who were begging you to listen to us.

In the PMs you, the paid staff members sent me imediately before you banned me from the forums, you explicitly stated, and I quote:

“If your actions continue to violate the guidelines, or reiterate points you’ve made multiple times, we will temporarily suspend you from the Forum for a week.”

And then when you did suspended me from the forums for “bringing up the same topic over and over again”, also known as, continually asking to be treated with bare minimum respect, you sent this:

“Per the warning message I sent you, we’ve decided to suspend your forum account for one week for continually disrupting conversations and attacking others. If you continue when your account is reinstated, you’ll be banned from the Forum. This may also affect your account on iNaturalist. Sockpuppet accounts will be grounds for a ban as well.”

by “disrupting conversation” you mean continuing the conversation about the tone policing and bigotry of the paid staff, which you are now saying you know was wrong. By “attacking others” you mean telling Astra to stop speaking over me and the other trans people, and our allies, who’ve spoken up during this incident.

“If you continue when your account is reinstated, you’ll be banned from the Forum.”

So since I was suspended for continuing to defend myself, which you now admit I shouldn’t have had to do, does this mean I will not be permanently banned from the forum for bringing these issues up again when they’re still not resolved?

Also why were you accusing me of using sockpuppets. Why would I create sockpuppets when I was boycotting iNaturalist. That kind of defeats the purpose.

This is not a real apology because you’ve done nothing to show you actually mean what you are saying, and you’ve done nothing but prove you still think your actions were right. The only thing you’re apologizing for is not removing the two posts misgendering me, but you’re completely avoiding aknowledging any of the problems you all specifically created in your reactions to us asking you to remove the posts.

The problem moved far beyond two posts migendering me as soon as you, the paid memebers of staff, decided to involve yourself by tone policing and victim blaming. At one point you literally told us that if we don’t want to be misgendered, we should just go somewhere else.

Nothing about this apology aknowledges any of this. And you’ve still not aknowledged it despite several other people now pointing it out.

And even if this apology were actually addressing the problems the staff created on their own, our demands were a public apology, not just here on the forums, but on iNaturalist.org as well, to prove that you are really holding yourselves responsible.

If you don’t want anyone outside the forums to know that you made a mistake in the first place, then that is just showing that you aren’t actually committed to making sure it never happens again.

There is no shame in making mistakes as long as you fix them. This is not fixing them. You are all still doubling down on your bigoted, tone policing behavior, and still equating “telling people they are being bigoted” to “personal attacks” “name calling” “labeling” and “sealioning”.

If you truly accept that what you did was wrong, then please, and I am being serious, list out what you did wrong. You’re getting paid for this. I am not, and neither have any of my allies who’ve spent their precious time and energy explaining to you all, for three weeks now, that you are being bigoted and harming your community.

The victims of this bigotry are not getting paid to educate you. You on the other hand are getting paid, but you are still refusing to actually listen and actually learn.

List out what you did wrong and explain how you’re going to do better in the future. You’re getting paid for it, so there’s no excuse not to.

Unless you’re going to pay me, and everyone else, for all the time and effort we’ve put in to educating you while receiving nothing but insults and retaliation, this apology, which does not aknowledge even half the things you did wrong, is not good enough.

Especially because as you’ve all proven over the past three weeks, there’s a 99% chance this post will be immediately hidden or locked away where no one is allowed to comment on it, and you will instead completely and willfully misinterpret everything I’ve written here to paint me as unreasonable and irrational and violent.

To all the people who’ve spoken up in my defence, whether you are trans or not, thank you.

To the iNaturalist staff:

  1. Please actually read this post
  2. Set a ten minute timer
  3. Play with a stress ball or look at cute pictures of kittens while you wait for the timer to be up
  4. Read this post again

And then do your job, as you are being paid to, and write a reply that represents the good of iNaturalist, not your own personal hurt feelings.

You are getting paid to be a good person. You are getting paid to make this community safe for everyone, including marginalized people.

We are not getting paid to defend ourselves from bigotry.

It is your job to put the good of the community ahead of your feelings, which are hurt by marginalized people criticizing your bigotry.

Edit: Here’s a link for a youtube video you can all watch about tone policing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty7pPe_P0Bs&ab_channel=ClaudiaBoleyn

8 Likes

Hi, nonbinary-naturalist.

If you have an issue with how the staff handled this, then message @forum_moderators with why you think they handled it wrong.

If you don’t want your messages to be “hidden” as you say, then take screenshots of every message you send, and every message they send to you and put it in the discord server or something.

1 Like

I have to disagree with you…I think when organisations rainbow-wash themselves for pride month and do things behind the scenes to the trans/nonbinary/queer community, it deserves to be brought to light.

Pride was a riot…gay rights didn’t happen by keeping things in the dark, and trans rights won’t happen that way either. Progress is made by putting light on the problems, not by hiding them in the dark.

12 Likes

I didn’t want to edit so i’m doubleposting (sorry!)

I really think iNat is at a crossroads here. I see glimmer of hope in that Tony moved my post and jason’s back to here after astra tried to hide them like all the posts before. I personally would like to see a trans/queer/nb bipogm person hired to be outreach and community coordinator as well.

Short apologies are great; but when such fails to address the core of the issues and part of the apology includes hidden within links a bolstered wall to protect staff from ‘dealing with us’; we have every right to be suspicious about it. I appreciate the detail of nonbinary-naturalists post of where these issues are, exactly. This gives a great roadmap for Staff to reflect on and correct, and is poking everyone along towards a more positive future.

6 Likes

I think it made great points and everything was worded politely. The entire situation has been unpleasant and a lot of people have voiced their opinions so I don’t see why what it said here shouldn’t be heard as well. I personally prefer for this to be out in the open and not behind closed doors, seeing as a lot of us are concerned and invested in the situation.

13 Likes

this thread began as a celebration of community has devolved into what seems to be the total opposite.

gender is a complicated topic – ask 10 different people for a definition of gender, and you’ll get 10 different definitions – and i think it was a good thing that iNaturalist attempted to even go down the road of celebrating human diversity and providing a space for willing participants to discuss and share experiences.

it seems like there’s been much learned by all, even with the recent discord in the thread. but people learn best through positive reinforcement, and neverending discord will eventually stifle learning / understanding and even lead perhaps to learning the wrong lessons. i’d hate for one of such lessons to be that celebrating human diversity comes with too many potential pitfalls to be worth attempting again in the future.

7 Likes

you can’t celebrate community if you aren’t willing to learn from your mistakes. We aren’t getting paid to educate people, but we’re still showing up here, three weeks later.

Asking for real justice and a real promise to do better isn’t neverending discord. You cannot celebrate community if you’re willing to shove the most marginalized people in your community out.

I’m pretty sure if we trans people, including me, the one who was being misgendered, are still willing to stick around educating people for free, in our own time, you can thank us and appreciate all the hard work we’re putting in instead of acting like we’re the ones being divisive.

Edit:

Seriously. We’re not getting paid for this, but we’re literally still here educating people for free on our own time. If I thought the iNaturalist were too far beyond hope to change their minds and really fix their mistakes, I wouldn’t be here, commenting this.

It’s not my job, or the job of any other marginalized people, to create “positive reinforcement” to convince people to stop being bigoted. I am not here to hold anyone’s hands and belittle them by acting like they’re children who don’t understand the difference between right and wrong.

Demanding that marginalized people who are facing bigotry be nicer to the people being bigoted against us (when we are being as polite as possible) is just more tone policing. You cannot celebrate the Queer / LGBT community here or anywhere else if you aren’t willing to listen to the people who are hurt by your actions, or the actions of others.

Edit #2:

I’d love nothing more than to be able to get back to sharing fun stories and stuff but I literally cannot do that until the paid iNaturalist staff prove that I’m actually welcome here, and that they will have the backs of other marginalized people in the future.

6 Likes