This one: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/why-getting-palaearctic-species-suggestions-for-nearctic-observations/48165/15
I am not seeing it as “expected nearby” today on the recent observation that popped up with this ID, but I am quite certain there was one I corrected last week where it did show this. Maybe the most recent CV update finally fixed it. There are still some stray observations for the complex in S. America and SE Asia which I suspect are also wrong but I have not corrected them because I only have species lists for Europe.
(Frustratingly, this is one of the cases where the criteria for what is included in the CV training paradoxically lead to worse suggestions. For most of the observations where it has been suggesting the complex L. gemmatum it at least has the subgenus – Dialictus – correct, whereas once the out-of-range species complex is taken out it suggests a different genus in the same family (Halictus subgenus Seladonia) or something completely different, like Chelostoma. Because Dialictus is one of the more difficult bee groups they are rarely ID’d to species, so the CV is unable to correctly suggest this for the thousands of observations in the subgenus in Europe)