A year or two ago, there was a spate of French speakers identifying things they didn’t know as “inconnu”, which happens to be the common name of a certain fish. I’ve recently been browsing disagreements, and I’ve found these:
A jay (a corvid) was misidentified as scad (a fish) which is called “jay” in Wolof.
Someone found a beetle which she thought was a ladybug and typed in “catarina”, which also happens to be a word for a kind of mantis shrimp.
Do you look for disagreements and try to resolve them? Have you seen an ant misidentified as a moose, or anything similar?
For a long time we had butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) labelled as a specific fish, that had a nickname “Lepidop”, since removed. The auto selection loved to choose this fish when you entered that name as the first result.
I recall seeing an observation of a grass originally identified as the fish genus Brama, I don’t recall what the grass was called but it was spelled very similarly to Brama so it’s likely what the identifier was trying to input. If anyone more familiar with plants than I knows of a grass that is spelled similar to Brama, please let me know so I can refind the observation!
I, and numerous others, have been caught identifying hoverflies in the genus Melanogaster as fungi of the same name.
The most annoying one for me is how often the uploader picks up Coccinellid names of the form ‘X-spot ladybird’ from my file names, and interprets it as ‘Spot Croaker’, an east coast North American fish… I have identified many of my own ladybird observations as fish in this way… :p
Also, I definitely intend to regularise the word ‘gazapatonic’ :)
If one is flying along with identifications for Deer in North America and going to ssp. beware of the drop down selection for Columbian Black-tailed Deer (as my meant-to-be choice) and yet Columbian Black-capped Chickadee is ready to sneak in there (like auto-fill) Columbian Black-capped Chickadee Poecile atricapillus ssp. fortuitus - as the ID. It’s happened to me enough (and to a few others). You hear back quick enough about the WT… ?