Provide a way to filter observations by disputed IDs

Update to those February links I offered

Pre-Mavericks for Pennsylvania has grown to almost 9K

We have abandoned the archive for resolved pre-mavericks and moved on to Placeholder Backup with 19K. (Hoping that since the new app has no placeholders, in time, we will get a better solution from iNat for website too)

Disagreements held at Plantae for Pennsylvania has also crept up to 250.

OK, this has been added! You’ll now see a “Disagreements” filter on the Identify page:

If you click that, the Identify page will show you observations that have at least one ID that is an explicit disagreement.

I’ve been testing this over the past week and I find it quite useful, especially if I also filter for taxa and places I know well.

Now, we’ve had to reindex basically every observation on the site over the past week or more for this to work, and the reindexing job isn’t complete yet. As of a few hours ago, it was still going through observations from 2022, but we’re releasing it now. I’ll make a bigger announcement once it’s completely ready.

Let us know if you think it’s helpful and if you notice any bugs.

32 Likes

Thank you - that gives me a way to tackle some of the African CNC backlog.

1 Like

This is fantastic, thank you–I’ll definitely be using this feature often.

Also works to look at one’s own observations for disagreements one may have missed the notification for. I found a bizarre taxon-swap gone awry that let to a disagreement I would never have found otherwise.

4 Likes

This is fantastic indeed! Thank you for this long-awaited feature! I have some clean-up to do.

Does it filter both for active and inactive disagreement? For example, in this observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/195023271 the first ID has been removed and all active IDs agree. Is it possible to ignore such observations?

I should probably add that this is the link I’m using to find the disagreements https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&quality_grade=casual%2Cresearch%2Cneeds_id&user_id=frousseu&disagreements=true

1 Like

Joining the chorus of this is great, thank you! Seems I missed quite a few notifications about disagreements… This makes it so much easier to find them!

1 Like

So good! Thanks for putting up with the pain of reindexing. It appears half my local disagreements are about the Sambucus problem

2 Likes

Checking my own - I found only 2 - including this, which was Added to CV in Sept 2023

But I already monitor mine using iNat’s Maverick link

You can also use the Pre-Maverick project as a filter

1 Like

Wonderfull. For me, it’s fine. Thanks a lot for the implementation. :)

1 Like

No, it should show any observation where there’s an active ID with a disagreement.

I don’t know if that’s possible. I suspect not, or if it is it might necessitate another big reindexing job. But I’m not an engineer.

1 Like

Another use for this new feature: Disagreements often prompt detailed explanations of how to identify stuff. I’ve already found a good number of valuable hints for telling tricky species apart checking for disagreements and looking at those with comments.

2 Likes

You might also add such observations to one of the projects here: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/observations-with-helpful-id-tips-umbrella-project

4 Likes

OK, I’m going to close this request as the reindexing should be just about done.

5 Likes