Consider this observation: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/71750108. The user has made a screenshot of a photo and used that for the observation. This seems to be dangerous as the photo metadata gets lost, so the user will have to manually edit it. It would not be surprising if most users don’t bother. Any recommendations on if these should be flagged somehow? Or are identifiers just expected to waste a lot of time questioning the data accuracy of such observations?
3 posts were merged into an existing topic: Screenshot Photos