The good thing about Wikipedia is it is accessible to all. As I mentioned above, it is possible to use it to follow links, and it is possible to confirm or correct information. As a researcher, I would be wary about quoting it as a source, but for most folks it’s a good place to start.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ways to help improve iNaturalist taxon pages through Wikipedia | 73 | 14924 | January 28, 2022 | |
| Creating missing Wikipedia articles for iNat's Observations of the Week | 28 | 2418 | June 23, 2024 | |
| Where do we share how to ID species? | 44 | 1035 | July 23, 2025 | |
| Are you fine with the current format of iNat’s species descriptions, or do you wish there was more info like how to identify the species etc? | 86 | 1756 | March 16, 2026 | |
| The academic rigour of RG observations | 25 | 1804 | September 9, 2019 |