You’re not the only one! Depending on the book/paper you look at, the term is either used for the entire group or for mosses only. In the botany texts I have, the “bryophytes” or nonvascular plants are treated as three separate groups: 1. Division/phylum Bryophyta (mosses), 2. division/phylum Hepatophyta/Marchantiophyta (liverworts), and 3. division/phylum Anthocerotophyta (hornworts). That’s also how iNat treats them, and there is currently no iNat taxon equivalent to “bryophytes” (nonvascular plants) that contains all three phyla. In older books/papers, they may be all lumped together as phylum Bryophyta with mosses, liverworts, and hornworts being classes within that group.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Make crustaceans and myriapods iconic taxa | 52 | 2249 | December 26, 2024 | |
| Why is inat so inconsistent with paraphyletic groupings that are still useful to have | 43 | 2266 | December 6, 2021 | |
| Learning taxonomy for newbie | 32 | 740 | March 18, 2026 | |
| Where are all the plant lovers? | 74 | 3291 | November 20, 2022 | |
| Useful casual observations being hidden by other low-grade casual observations | 36 | 1789 | January 13, 2023 |