I cannot imagine that curators and their staff update specimen labels. I curate our state bird collection, for the past 30 years. Years ago, I did try but we were quickly overwhelmed with taxonomic “updates”, thanks to the onslaught on genetic analyses being done. And ours is a modest collection - ~20,000. But then, thankfully, came electronic taxonomies with taxonomy histories, and such. Most of our collection data go into VertNet which is “one stop shopping” for researchers. And then over to GBIF. But if someone queries the data, with an old name, it is converted and the user gets results with the new name that includes both old/new. So, after my brief few years of correcting our specimen labels, I gladly stopped.
Plus, I feel that anyone working with specimen data needs to know taxonomy and as has been stated, use the data properly. So far, with all the loan requests over the years, this has proven to be true.
But, has also been noted, birds are easy and well-known. We used to have a curator of Millipedes (had to mention this, since millipedes were mentioned earlier). The taxonomy of millipedes was always in flux, and he was a big reason for that. But the beauty of the collections is that, (hopefully) they are always here for just about anyone to study. We don’t get many requests from the “general public” but we’ve had a handful over the years. These from “citizen scientists” working on questions in their own time, and such. And we always welcome them, help them get set up, maybe provide some equipment, desk space, etc.
The latest trend of scanning Museum-based field logs, specimen labels, and specimens themselves, and then placing online to allow “crowd-sourcing” help, is a fantastic trend (to me).
For the past decade I’ve mentored a pack of teenagers to learn specimen prep and collections management tasks. They love it. And are very good at all of it, once trained. But it’s laborious, time-consuming work on my part. Which means, it takes money - my salaried time (I was given some time to try this out with the kids, and it worked, so they let me keep doing it, for other reasons). If there were additional funds to cover some of our costs we could put “a million” kids to work to help get the data up to speed, around the world.
One last thing (I Know this is a long reply!). I had a tech a few years ago, to help me in Nicaragua. She never went to college. She worked hard “on her own” to learn birds and field techniques. Obviously not completely on her own - she learned from others. The point is, she took the initiative to do this, in a non-traditional manner. She was one of my best technicians ever. I overheard someone ask her “are you an ornithologist?” To which she replied “Oh no, I didn’t go to college”. Baloney. I had to intervene to say she was absolutely an ornithologist and a mighty fine one at that.
I love working with people like her…
John