Yes, in particular its misuse for multiple-species observations, that get fixed later, but remain flagged as “No, it’s as good as it can be” although a much better ID is fairly possible. Check this project to see how many there are : https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/the-community-taxon-is-as-good-as-it-can-be
BTW, please vote for this feature request that can prevent a misuse of the “Based on the evidence, can the Community Taxon still be confirmed or improved?” DQA:
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/easy-way-to-mark-multiple-species-observations/278