Mentioned many times by multiple people in several topics but doesn’t look like anyone ever made a feature request. I don’t currently support this feature request, just putting it out there to facilitate discussion.
It’s not possible to determine whether some organisms are wild or not. Certain plants in ecological restoration projects, fish in stocked areas, garden “volunteers”-or-not, and many other cases extensively discussed elsewhere on the forum (search for captive, cultivated, or wild).
This feature request is not proposing the default selection be changed to unknown, but to remain as wild. I am also not suggesting that more than one additional option should be added. These observations should not appear on taxon page range maps.
I do think if this is ever implemented it would be contingent on there being a more nuanced treatment of Casual / Needs ID / Research Grade and Verifiable / Not Verifiable. Discussion of that much larger topic should be held on existing or other topics (like the “Rename Research Grade” one).
I haven’t thought about how the voting system would work and how many votes/majority would be required to move it from one state to another.