Using - windows 10, Chrome
When was making a comment on this observation:
You will see near the end of the discussion, there is the following comment made by me, the error is the ‘1.’ that has been sub’ed in for a 3) or 4):
I’ve uploaded another shot I took under the scope. Between this, and the other pic’s already uploaded. Have the following from the key
- P similis has clamp connections - so not this species
3’) Clamp connection absent - or with scattered knob like pesudoclamps at septa.
So 4 and 4 ’ come down to:
- Pilenipellus with large, fusoid-pointed terminal cells or
4’) Pileipellis with inconspicuous, cylindrical-rounded terminal cells.
Looking at the cells I think they are spindle like, so (4). Also spores are:
- Short and cylindrical
I think the spores above are cylindrical. So again with (4)
There is also a pleurocystidia measurement which I am going to ignore for the time being.
So (4) is P microspermus.
But this is different from what I typed out. What I typed is shown in the pictures for this obs, since I took a screen shot of things and stored on the obs till I figured out to log a bug (my first log, so hopefully doing ok). .
If I go an edit the comment, the real numerals and ) symbol used shows up as it should. But in publishing the 1. numbers appear instead.
Hopefully this is clear? and not as clear as mud :)
[Screenshot added by moderator:]