Has anyone suggested the removal of the “Seen Nearby” suggestion for observations that are outside of atlased ranges (when applicable)? Or remove the suggestion altogether if outside the atlased range? “Nearby” is somewhat relative; 100 km is a large distance for many species. This seems particularly relevant for observations with very restricted ranges with visually similar relatives found “nearby” (e.g. terrestrial gastropods or island endemics). Naturally taxa would need to be atlased for this to work and maybe there’s some issues with atlases anyway. But atlasing taxa seems like a way to make “nearby” more objective and species-specific. Not sure how hard that would be or how intensive it would be to check for each observation.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species Suggestions for the Wrong Continent | 90 | 11120 | July 21, 2020 | |
| Some 'interesting' AI suggestions of late | 41 | 2262 | September 10, 2022 | |
| Change computer vision suggestions to only above species level | 31 | 3163 | March 26, 2019 | |
| CV suggestions are bizarre, not "visually similar" at all | 65 | 2237 | February 2, 2023 | |
| Problems with Computer Vision and new/inexperienced users | 132 | 6281 | October 28, 2021 |