Can you report an identifier?

[bouteloua]

@kiwifergus

If we are to EXPLICITLY DISAGREE WHEN WE SEE A LACK OF EVIDENCE , then the identification needs to have that “Joe disagrees it’s a fish” removed, because that starts the arguments. If, on the other hand, we are to ONLY EXPLICITLY DISAGREE WHEN WE SEE EVIDENCE IT IS NOT THAT SPECIES (which is what I personally understand the explicit disagreements to be for) then the question needs to be changed accordingly. Even just a statement from iNat to indicate which use-case is correct, would help resolve the arguments over these quicker.

This has already been answered by staff and is clearer in the wording in the pop-up than the misleading text attached to the IDs. Explicitly disagreeing based on a lack of evidence is a normal use case for the “orange button”. More on that topic here: https://www.inaturalist.org/blog/25514-clarifying-ancestor-disagreements and https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/change-wording-used-by-the-system-when-downgrading-an-observation-to-an-higher-level-taxa/3862/107