When users select licenses that are too restrictive for incorporation into GBIF observations that reach the current definition of Research Grade still say “It can now be used for research and featured on other websites” under Data Quality Assessment.
While specific licensing is stated above this area, it is not as prominent and probably many users do not fully understand licensing. So should this text be changed for these more restrictive licenses, stating that while it may be research grade, licensing chosen by the user prohibits use for research and other websites?
I think if research grade were to ever be modified, we should consider whether licensing should be a component of the grade of observations, but that is beyond the specifics here.
Also related - opting out of community id: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/user-opted-out-of-community-id-and-observation-doesnt-become-research-grade/3601