A recent sighting of the week here on iNat was a rare Cicada. People in the article were mentioning filling in the gaps, as in there are zero observations for… whatever. I found that article to be a terrific story. Filling in the gaps with lucky finds. I’ve gotten lucky a few times. To target a gap, I like to look at the taxonomy, and then all subspecies added to the database. Looking to the right, one can hone in on those observations with only zeros and single digits, and those would be gaps. Is there a better way to find gaps? Also, a better way to find the biggest gaps in my area?
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation needs? | 8 | 1192 | April 23, 2020 | |
| Gathering observations to share with non-iNat folks | 7 | 556 | July 28, 2019 | |
| Unobserved Species | 7 | 963 | October 23, 2023 | |
| Is there a way to see what species have no observations? | 10 | 1569 | September 30, 2019 | |
| List of taxa yet to be documented on iNat | 8 | 463 | February 8, 2021 |