In an effort to make good on my offer to @astra_the_dragon to volunteer helping with a future Mentorship pilot program, I wanted to open up discussion on what would improve the experience for both Mentors and Mentees.
Please offer your suggestions. Let’s keep them all in one place for easier follow-up. Let’s brainstorm together and gather helpful resources, etc.
Looking forward to your valuable input. Thanks in advance.
Here are the previous posts about the pilot program:
Thank you very much!
If you have a Discord account that’s where I coordinate with most people who help me out. If you want to send me your info in a private message it would be easier to go from there.
That said, there are some conversations that may benefit most from being held out on the forum.
But other conversations are a lot more boring, not to mention not necessarily right for a nature forum, like how to set up an automatic matching program so that it can scale optimally (and whether that’s a good idea in the first place).
And boring tasks like sending people reminders which often boils down to sending twenty five copies of the same message with slight variations. Or hunting down people who misspelled their names on the form.
Will have a Discord account by the end of the day.
I appreciate your sense of etiquette for the Forum and agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments!
Boring tasks R us!
I’m not sure if this is possible, but I think it would be helpful to put up a banner somewhere on the home page and when users first open the app so that users who aren’t familiar with the forum can learn about this opportunity.
It seems matching was tricky. I’m wondering if matching specific mentors and mentees is even necessary. Maybe alternatively there could be one identify URL for everyone who signed up to be followed and receive feedback, with a list of locations and groups of organisms they are interested in learning more about. Potential mentors/experts in those areas/groups could then use that link and the filters in Identify to refine the pool to match their personal expertise. Mentor-mentee relationships may develop naturally - e.g. if you notice someone who does a lot of IDs/observations in your area, or someone who follows up on a lot of your stuff, you could contact each other for more detailed discussions.
The other thing that came up was more general questions how to use the app and the features in Identify, or even just the settings on the website, to make this more efficient etc. This could be addressed with some more general tutorials, or maybe having a group event (chat, zoom, whatever) to answer more general questions that might be of interest for all.
I think having a stream or some video demos how folks approach identifying stuff would also be useful as well and maybe a good place to start. When I teach students a new skill, often I will demonstrate first, then let them try it under supervision, and once they’ve got a handle on it I let them do it by themselves but will be available for questions/assistance if necessary. That seems to work well. I think what was missing in this mentorship pilot was the first step - the demo.
that identification programme you are talking about? if yes, than it was fun, I loved that programme, I face no problem, but one location time zone were different, but that didn’t bother me much. So I guess the previous one was perfect :)