The thread Identification Quality on iNaturalist covers this well. There is also a journal article on the Identification Quality Experiment. I recall reading somewhere, but I cannot now locate, that the misidentification rate in iNaturalist is lower than the rate seen in some curated collections such as herbaria. In part this is apparently an effect of “many eyes” and the dynamic nature of identifications in iNaturalist.
danaleeling
40
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Kind Reminder To Only Identify What You Are Sure Of! | 31 | 2071 | April 8, 2024 | |
| Certainty and uncertainty in identification | 93 | 3708 | March 22, 2023 | |
| Etiquette for ID of species with no visual differences | 157 | 8758 | January 23, 2020 | |
| I'm no specialist, how should I proceed with my observations? | 35 | 2539 | January 4, 2022 | |
| Identification Etiquette on iNaturalist - Wiki | 203 | 36893 | November 3, 2025 |