Thank you - it would be helpful for our own particular mission on iNat to have these filters for missing metadata. I guess I should submit a feature request.
1 Like
Oops, or according to the intro page there, to âsuggest it as a specific idea for one of the large items on the [2019 development] agendaâ. Will come back to this later!
4 Likes
Is there a way of searching for observations which I havenât identified? Specifically Iâd like to check if there are any of my observations which I have forgotten to ID (and I guess others would find that useful too).
Not that I am aware of.
When you identify an observation it marks it as âreviewedâ.If you donât mark observations as âreviewedâ unless youâve identified them, then the âidentifyâ page automatically shows you only those you havenât IDâd. Under the explore filters you can select âmore filtersâ then âreviewedâ=no. Is this not quite what you want?
3 Likes
Why does this query work only for organisms which are wild?
Search/filters default to only showing âverifiableâ observations, (which excludes captive/planted), just untick âverifiableâ or add â&verifiable=anyâ to the url.
4 Likes
Making some progress with this at last, thanks to all the help here.
Currently trying to find results filtering âsimultaneouslyâ by two fields with specific values for each. I have tried using the Observation Field & Value search first, showing the results in Explore, then adding to the url the second Field and value.
Didnât succeed with that - might be due to a mistake or maybe the code needs to be changed in that situation.
I will post an example but canât at present as I have tried several variations and donât have an example intact at present.
In the meantime, is there a general principle for filtering for two sets of Field/Value?
and a corollary - as a workaround, I created a Project which requires one of the Fields. Using that Project as a filter of Field/Value results in Explore view, I can filter Observation Field values successfully to results which also have the field required for the project. But since the Project wonât require a certain Value (at least, not by any means I have tried) the results still need to be filtered by the second Value.
UPDATE:
I may have made an error in code, or maybe it didnât work withField results filtered by the Project requiring another Field, because this example worked:
https://inaturalist.nz/observations?verifiable=any&place_id=any&field:Zone%20Bd%20Native%20Plant%20Trail%20entry=KR&field:KCRENH19%20Survey=Weed%20invasion-new
Embarrassed that I canât figure this out, but where is the list of term_ids and term_value_ids?
They are the numbers defined in the part of the wiki quoted below, found by scrolling down through the top post in this thread.
2 Likes
I donât know if Iâm just being dumb or what, but Iâm trying to search for leps and beetles, in NY, that donât have life stage annotations. Ive been trying
and itâs still showing me observations that have these annotations. What am I doing wrong? Or did it just stop working at some point? Thanks.
without_term_id seems to work with identify, but not with observations.
2 Likes
Well, thatâs annoying. Thanks for letting me know, though!
1 Like
Someone might have an answer. I just have never had luck with the one, but the other works fine. Identify can show RG items, so that might be a workaround.
@clockwood what is the aim of your search? If itâs to find obs without annotations so that you can add annotations, then Identify would be your best option anyway.
I donât want to use Identify because Iâm on mobile.
1 Like
Okay. I have not used the app, so I donât know how Identify on mobile is different to the web setup.
1 Like
Does not work anymore, hence i have created a feature request.
Is there a way to access the Disagreement Count directly, so that I could query Disagreement Count>1 on my own IDâs to see where people have disagreed with my IDs?
I know there is a field available in CSV data exports called num_identification_disagreements, but I donât know of a way to query its value in a search URL.