Implement more filtering tools for Casual grade observations

Formalizing my request from this post https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/disappointing-consistent-failure-users-not-marking-observations-as-cultivated/8791/67?u=lotteryd

Categories of the Casual section could be broken down usefully to add identifications (and/or to fix glitches) on Casual-grade records of interest. Preferred first choice to exclude from my perspective: Unknown place or date. Filtering might be achieved by extra filter checkboxes being added to the filtering pane of the Identify modal; or by letting flags’ status be queried via elements that would go into a search url.

-Unknown place and/or date [already doable, see below]
-marked date and/or location Not Accurate
-marked No/No recent evidence of organism
-marked Can’t be improved
-Unlabeled records by users who have opted out of Community ID
-Records with Copyrighted Media Removed

Note: “Cultivated” subset is already filterable, see https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/make-captive-cultivated-not-automatically-no-id-needed/112/7

Update:“Unknown date” subset can already be removed, see https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/disappointing-consistent-failure-users-not-marking-observations-as-cultivated/8791/90

Update: Most of “Unknown location” subset can be removed? see
https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/disappointing-consistent-failure-users-not-marking-observations-as-cultivated/8791/104

To look for Casual Unknowns that are not Captive and missing a lot of the broken elements, therefore use this chunk in a search url:

&quality_grade=casual&iconic_taxa=unknown&captive=false&photos=true&d1=1900-01-01&nelat=69.53404715698059&nelng=180&place_id=any&swlat=-68.52872745050472&swlng=-180&without_taxon_id=67333%2C131236%2C151817

To search for the Captive side, just switch to captive=true to give:

&quality_grade=casual&iconic_taxa=unknown&captive=true&photos=true&d1=1900-01-01&nelat=69.53404715698059&nelng=180&place_id=any&swlat=-68.52872745050472&swlng=-180&without_taxon_id=67333%2C131236%2C151817

BTW if adding searchability by flags, refinement by adding searchability by flag user may have its upsides in being able to find and fix sets made by a “vandal”, or by someone misunderstanding or repeatedly misclicking on a flag. (Downside of that though could be increasing chance of interpersonal conflict between people with strong opinions on a particular flag.)

1 Like

what do you mean by flag?

Each time someone ticks a DQA box like the ones in these examples, I think of that as a “flag”. But, I don’t know the terminology the site builders actually use, so feedback is welcome from that side.

-marked No/No recent evidence of organism
-marked Can’t be improved

3 Likes

Just crossposting some answers to these for easier findability in the future:

Casual Unknowns, excluding some broken elements, that are not captive
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?&quality_grade=casual&geo=true&iconic_taxa=unknown&captive=false&photos=true&d1=1900-01-01&without_taxon_id=67333%2C131236%2C151817

That are captive:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?&quality_grade=casual&geo=true&iconic_taxa=unknown&captive=true&photos=true&d1=1900-01-01&without_taxon_id=67333%2C131236%2C151817

(looks like it’s just a couple hundred difference from the bounding box links above)

3 Likes

I have found that the geo=false or =true chunk still doesn’t respectively pull up or exclude a strange set that are captured by the bounding box urls I have above, but still have blank coordinates and report a “Location Unknown” map.

However, this tiny bounding box can fish them up. Here’s everything whether 0,0 or blank:

https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&quality_grade=needs_id%2Ccasual%2Cresearch&per_page=100&photos=true&d1=1900-01-01&nelat=0&nelng=0&swlat=0&swlng=0

1 Like