There seems to be a new difficulty during the process of duplicating observations. I posted an observation of a Western Honey Bee on a White Melilotus. Then I duplicated the observation so that I would be able to use it for an observation of the White Melilotus. By the time I could see the new flower observation, it was automatically identified as a Spider Orchid. I added four new photos of the flower, deleted the cropped bee photo I started with, and changed the ID to White Melilotus, and the result is an observation showing that I disagree with myself for originally identifying the flower as a Spider Orchid (which I never did). Is this how this is supposed to work?
If a Computer Vision ID is necessary in the making of a duplicate observation, could there be a lag time before it’s made? If not, could the Computer Vision icon appear at least to indicate that the Spider Orchid ID may not have been intentional?