Last I checked there was no significant difference between 13 pro and later models in macro mode. But trying my friends 17 after my phone stopped working, it seemed on another level.
Does anyone have comparison shots of 13 pro vs later models, or anecdotal evidence specifically wrt shooting inverts?
I can’t find much online which really nails down whether its better to fix my 13 pro or just upgrade to a newer phone.
The 40x telephoto definitely seemed like a big upgrade for birds though when I tried.
I’ve heard from a professor that the 17 pro is a huge upgrade. (They said it’s better for taking pics through a microscope than those dedicated microscope cameras).
Didn’t Apple put the bump on the back specifically to fit larger/more components? Would make sense that that has quite a big effect
I was really disappointed by the 13 Pro macro, personally. I loved my XS with a Ztylus macro (no longer made, unfortunately). The 13 Pro felt like a downgrade from the XS. I no longer feel that with the 16 Pro.
XS tortoise beetle (pretty sure, even though the camera metadata is missing from the Classic app)
And just for additional comparison, I’m pretty sure this one was taken on my iPhone 6s with a Ztylus macro.
Oh interesting, thanks Carrie! ( and other commenters too )
I bought the Ztylus Revolvr following your review of it on a much older thread I think.
So good!
I then used it on an iPhone 7 I think… and was also disappointed moving to the 13 pro - not only re:quality, but with the UI issues in play as well - constantly shifting lenses…it definitely made for a drop in recording ability.
So it’s interesting to hear the 16 feels better than both options.
I used the 17 only briefly and my own camera was broken so couldn’t compare.
But it also felt to me like it might be a significant bump.
I ended up fixing my 13 for now, but I will see if I can take some photos against a 17 to compare at some point. Sadly, not many tortoise beetles round here though…