Make the most innovative project you can

Here is a fun challenge -

Try to innovate. Make the most useful project possible.

I am listing some projects that are excellent and their shortcomings too. We (I mean, who ever is interested) will attempt to make a useful (and great) innovation to use the pre-existing projects. In the end of this year we can literally vote for which project is the most worth. I have planned how that is to be done.

You mast be the one who made the project. Apart from that, I am mentioning some other project that will inspire you to get creative. Anyone can join.

Also please do not copy other’s ideas, it will not be eligible. You must submit all projects’ links as replies.

Here are some projects to inspire you to start something worth it -

1: Tracking genera/species without a name can be tricky, as we cannot id as a particular taxon and keep track. iNat recently added the ā€œProvisional taxa pilotā€, but why use that when we have traditional projects in hand?

To solve such problems, we can use traditional project as a better workaround, and I made a perfect example. This is the first submission here (which is my own), https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/ecuador-s-mystery-undescribed-fulgorid-genus .

Shortcomings to this project: There is no major potential or existent shortcoming except one (or two). Firstly, if the genus and species are described then it will have to be deleted as it will be useless afterwards. But it helps us keep undescribed taxa in one place until they are described!

Secondly, it is possible that new observations are not added to the credit to the inattentiveness of the project curator (me), but as I am a regular identifier of Fulgoridae I will be able to maintain it well. Also another thing is that it is not a very common taxon and I have never seen observations of them outside Ecuador. Maintenance is no hassle, unlike the next project whose biggety shortcoming is nothing but maintenance.

2: To help (and entertain) identifiers. It is seriously a thing when you feel that there is nothing much for you to id, you get bored and scrolling through observations gives no motivation. It is also another common struggle of identifiers when they need literally one more supporting id and that just does not come. It waiting worth it???

To answer this, there is an excellent pool of observations under the project called https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/pre-maverick! It is so entertaining to go there and add some ids! But it is very little known. The caption says it was based on an idea by @dianastuder, (who was by chance also supposedly my ā€œforum best friend of the yearā€:rofl: (to add some humour but seriously it not a joke, just so much by chance) and it is likely one of the coolest projects out there. It is something beyond just innovation, instead it is a great contribution to the entire community. Any one who joins the project can add observations to it.

Shortcomings to this project: Firstly, it is not much popular. In fact, I chose this topic not only to see how much we can do with project but also to promote this project. This is completely destroying the functionality of the project. One identifier adds it to this project thinking that someone will help out. However, no one is there to do this. So unfortunate.

It is also true that this project lack maintenance. I mean by maintenance by the fact that many identifiers forget to remove observations from this project once the id is turned over. This is one of the self sorting projects. The moment the id is flipped, the observation is research grade. Before that it is under" ā€œNeeds IDā€. If the project curators want then they can (and should) remove all research grade obs. from from the project as that shows the wrong id has already been mavericked.

3: A visual delight! Sometimes we just feel bored. I think those who have reached here may have their eyes paining, so what better reward exists than a show of fluorescence under UV!

It is amazing to know (and see) that there is already a project for such observations. It showcases the beauty of nature under a UV torch. See the project here - https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/uv-fluorescent-organisms !

Shortcomings to this project: I do not think there is any shortcoming here, except lack of popularity which will bring not only more pre-existent observations of creature under UV under this project but also encourage more people to observe the dramatic change of colour that comes when you look with a UV torch.

Now I look forward to see what project(s) you all can make! (and yes I will also try to innovate)

2 Likes

The Pre-Maverick question was mine

But the coding and answer are by @jeanphilippeb

5 Likes

Identifiers don’t forget. We aren’t able to do it. Only curators/managers/admin of the project, the person who put the observation in the project, and the person whom the observation belongs to can remove an observation from a project.

9 Likes

I have the ability to remove observation A from project B if I’m the one who uploaded A to B. Of course, I often don’t notice that I should.

As an observer, if you need help for an observation, it is better to tag an identifier for help than to add the observation to a project.

The Pre-Maverick project is updated automatically: a few times a year, many observations are added/removed (as mentioned here). It has never been intended that observers/identifiers add/remove observations manually. Updating the project manually would have no added value.

You can easily filter out RG observations and/or use the Identify link in the ā€˜About’ section of the project. Filter the observations by location and/or taxon, according to your interest, as an identifier. If you have finished, come back after the next update.

I am positively surprised that the project has 348 members so far. Thank you.

7 Likes

You can remove your own obs from the project - when it is RG, or before if you wish. Your obs is yours and the decision is in your hands. (Sorry - reiterating what you said)

287K observers can ask - why is my obs Pre-Maverick ? What is that ? We have (still) over half a million obs in the project. Oldest obs waiting - tree in Central Park NY June 2008 ! Or We had the right ID from loarie 10 years ago !

2 Likes

Ok, I didn’t know this. i never attempted to remove an obs. from a project actually.

Ok, maybe not as I thought, but is so much needed that this project’s management is done properly.

Let me take an example - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/332533951. Not pre-maverick anymore.

It is mostly identifiers who add observations to this project.

Ok, thanks for letting me know.

I think no one really is interested in the main topic…

You could still evaluate new projects from 2026.

Yes, that was one of the 3 cases I mentioned

  1. you are curator/manager/admin
  2. you put it in there
  3. it’s your observation
1 Like

Sorry, I can’t think of anything that hasn’t already been done

Not at all, see:
https://www.inaturalist.org/project/pre-maverick/terms

image

Not a all. This never happened.

1 Like

Yes, it is very interesting!

A project I add observations to, whenever I have the opportunity:
https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/accidental-epiphytes

2 Likes

What do you mean?

Then why is it added to the project, what is the purpose?

That one is also creative. Really cool. Reminds me of the UV project bit that was another person’s project, not my credit.

I am working on a very large scale and complicated set of interconnected projects which will form a full setup (literally). That one will be a real surprise that will make you redefine the power of projects. It is literally a masterpiece.

I reformulate my answer:

No. Only project curators can add observations to this project.

Yes. We hope that some identifiers will help with the observations in the project.

1 Like

The purpose of the Pre-Maverick project ?

https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/dianastuder/77588-meet-the-pre-mavericks

Just in case JP also has a set of yellow label projects across all the taxa https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/jeanphilippeb/73398-phylogenetic-projects-for-unknown-observations

2 Likes