New Camera Ideas?

Hi everyone,

I am hoping to get some advice regarding which camera I should purchase. I currently have a Nikon Coolpix L330 and I am in desperate need of an upgrade. I want something that has a magnificent zoom and performs well in low light. I know that combination can be hard to find, especially in my budget of >$1300. I really like the ease of bridge cameras but I am open to anything. I am currently looking at the Nikon Coolpix p1100 as its zoom is spectacular but I have some concerns regarding it’s low light performance. Thanks in advance for any advice.

4 Likes

Bridge cameras will struggle in low light, since the sensor is smaller, but I think this is pretty unavoidable. I think the P950, P1000, or P1100 would be good options for the zoom (P1100 is the most recent model). :)

2 Likes

I’d go with the P900 or 950, myself. They still have the 1 2/3" sensor, but you’re not getting the unwieldiness and slower AF of the 1000 and 1100 models. The 950, from what I’ve read, seems to have hit a sweet spot for buffer size, frames per second in Burst mode, and weight. Don’t know if this matters, but the 950 also has a hot shoe for an external flash.

If you don’t know about DPReview yet, here’s the link for the Nikon page. They haven’t reviewed the 1100 yet, but they have reviews for older models, and the site forum is a great place to look for real-world experiences and feedback. CameraDecision also does some head-to-head comparisons of Nikon bridge cameras. I linked to the P900 vs. P950 comparison, but they also have a page for P1000 vs. P1100, and a couple of others.

One thing that you might want to bear in mind is that none of these models has bupkuss in the way of weatherproofing. If you’re going to be out when there’s even a chance of rain or snow, that could prove a serious problem. My suggestion would be to look at all of the features, choose the least expensive model that has everything that you know you can’t live without, and pick up a good rain cover.

(I shoot a P520 myself; I got it after my L330 was stolen. The one thing that I really miss is the continuous shooting mode. The 330 was amazing for storm photos with lightning.)

2 Likes

I have a P1000. The zoom is good. Low light performance is worse than cameras with larger sensors, but “acceptable” is subjective. The shots are identifiable but won’t win any contests.

  • Nikon said at launch that the P1100 was identical to the P1000 except it charges with a USB C instead of micro USB. I don’t know if that is true anymore.
  • It is heavy, but again that’s subjective. It’s like carrying a 1.5l bottle of water in your hand. The grip is reasonably comfortable. I don’t have issues, but others might. I have found the weight and balance makes it easier to shoot through the viewfinder held like an old-school SLR instead of using the lcd panel at arm’s length.
  • It’s also big. I don’t use a strap as I can’t imagine it dangling from my neck.
  • 200 to 300 shots on a battery, more if burst mode is off. Charging a dead battery in the camera takes 10+ hours. You get about 15 shots warning on the dead battery indicator.
  • GPS is via Bluetooth from your smartphone. Most other tethered functions are via Wi-Fi, which is dodgy and slow.
  • Autofocus is a couple generations old so not very good (read: bad for most things that are small or move).
    • It hunts and is slow.
    • Subject focus tracking is primitive and not available in Auto mode.
  • It’s really hard to track a moving subject at full zoom.
  • Not weatherproof. I have had mine damp from drizzle, but I don’t let it rain on it.
  • Low light performance decreases as zoom increases; it’s an f8 camera at full zoom so pretty slow.
  • Photos seem soft most of the time, but I assume that’s me not the camera.
  • It has a macro mode that I rarely use. I get better shots by increasing distance and using the zoom, but that may be technique.
  • No focus bracketing if you think you ever want to try stacking.

That’s my list of complaints, but 18,000 shots in I have been happy with it. It isn’t perfect but suits my interests. And being point and shoot, it does a lot of the work for you.

Some example shots that push or exceed the limits of the camera, tripod mounted unless noted, jpegs not RAW, processing consists of a crop and the “auto” button in iOS photos. Generally shot in Auto or Programmed Auto mode. Photos typically look better than this, subject to the ability of the photographer.

Full sun, full zoom, range 2000m or more:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237551321 (5000m range)
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237557541

Full zoom, shooting from sun into shadows, 2000m:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237558223

Overcast, half zoom (1500mm equivalent), 3000m:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237554576

Full sun, half zoom, estimated 15000m (not a typo, most of way to horizon at sea). I couldn’t frame the shot at full zoom.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/299253715

Full sun, 2400mm zoom, ~1000m:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237556841

Burst, full sun, 400mm zoom, handheld:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/299254824

Civil twilight, 300mm, handheld:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/313457071
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/313457660

Civil twilight, 1800mm, handheld, heavily processed:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/313457787

Full sun, handheld, 1000mm zoom, 50m range, just so you see it can take decent photos:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/328099122

Birds in flight, handheld, which is a weakness:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/266395264
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/324624963
The harrier was just before twilight.

Small subject, handheld:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/308556714

4 Likes

I have a Panasonic Lumix, which has 196X zoom, and can take really nice pics up to around 60X as long as you hold it steady, but it’s not the best at night time. I still have trouble with grainy-ness when the shutterspeed is too high, and the nighttime setting isn’t very good, in my opinion. I guess it just kind of depends on whether or not you have a flashlight for night macro, and whether you are okay with that. All in all, it’s a pretty good camera though!

1 Like

I strongly recommend the canon R100 (R50 is good as well, it’s got more FPS for sport photography)


If you want a really nice zoom, i recommend the Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM lens to go with it.

This is the gear I’m usimg right now, and I started using it a couple of days ago. The results cam be stunning!


This was taken in pretty low light conditions… it turned out really good!


On the other hand, the images taken in good light conditions are super sharp!

3 Likes