Problems with sightings being transferred to the Atlas of Living Australia

[pisum]

@thebeachcomber

The ALA somehow only has 752 observations, of which only ~530 of these are from iNaturalist. Almost every single observation on iNat (804/806) is research grade, so why are there over 270 records of this species that have not been piped to the ALA?

i didn’t check in detail, but this is probably because of licensing. (see https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/how-often-does-data-get-updated-to-atlas-of-living-australia/12993/8. there’s not a further post to indicate that ALA made a fix to address licensing, but it seems like they must have.)