These require an observation field for each to be filled out before it can be added to the project. I generally record the scents in the notes first and then copy them into the observation field later when I add them to the projects.
Scent (and taste) can be a powerful tool for identification since the smell of an organism can indicate something about its chemical profile. But for the same reason, ārecording scentsā is extremely difficult, it requires the same chemicals to be reproduced in the same ratios as the scent to be recorded. Many of these organic chemicals donāt preserve well and/or are unstable in the type of medium in which we might store them. Any reproduction of a biological scent is therefore likely to be only a crude approximation, it is seldom practical to try reproducing a scent using a scratch-and-sniff type of record.
A more practical option is to try and record the scent using language, comparing the smell to other smells familiar to people. This is still a rather crude approximation since peopleās perceptions of smell are subjective, but it can still be extremely useful in some circumstances and is well worth pursuing.
Iāve imagined what it would be like if you could somehow record a scent on your phone and upload it to iNat. Iām sure a lot of āskunkā observations would be misidentified as something else :-P
I joined your Leaves project and added some Australian plants.
I am not into sweet florals but Iāll to records some that are eligible on the Flowers.
I realised that scratchies are really out of date.
There is Madeleine the headspace capture camera and some serious portable analytical devices.
On demand reproduction would need hundreds of volatiles.
When I ask for a relaxing mixed forest scent I would get āPlease replace the alpha-pinene cartridgeā