Should subspecies inherit conservation statuses from species?

I’m confused why the domestic rabbit, an invasive subspecies of the European rabbit seems to have all the conservation statuses from the European rabbit. I put the domestic rabbit down as least concern, but the list on the taxon page includes everything from European rabbit as well. Is this as intended?

1 Like

Also true for varieties – see the domestic swan goose, listed as vulnerable because of the status on the parent species.

1 Like

Meadow Jumping Mouse as a species is a Least Concern, but two of its subspecies – New Mexico and Preble’s – are federally listed and thus their location data on iNat is obscured. I believe iNat accurately reflects the different statuses of the species as a whole vs the vulnerable subspecies.

But I can see in some cases the status in some populations can get carried over into other populations where it does not apply. An example is Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) which as a species is considered Vulnerable in its native rage but also in the introduced U.S. populations, where that status really does not apply.

1 Like