Screenshots of what you are seeing:
Description of problem: Tree Crickets (subfamily Oecanthinae) used to be a part of family Gryllidae before they were transferred to an expanded concept of family Oecanthidae. The taxonomy was updated on inat years ago, but some observations of Oecanthinae continue to appear in family Gryllidae. The screen shot above is a search for family Gryllidae in a one province of Costa Rica (Guanacaste). You can see that one observation of subfamily Oecanthinae is in there, even though Oecanthinae is not a Gryllidae. If you go to that one observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/125616039), there seems to be nothing special about it and it looks like its taxonomy is mapped correctly. In fact, if you just click on that ‘one observation’ it opens all the Oecanthinae from that province (61 observations, not 1). I used Guanacaste as an example here, but this isn’t a unique case and if you search Gryllidae for many jurisdictions there are a limited number of Oecanthinae that wrongly appear. As another example, there there are 25 observations of Oecanthinae that appear in Gryllidae of USA, even though there are more than 42,000 observations of Oecanthinae in USA that don’t appear in a search for Gryllidae. What’s happening here?