Please fill out the following sections to the best of your ability, it will help us investigate bugs if we have this information at the outset. Screenshots are especially helpful, so please provide those if you can.
Platform: Website
Browser: Chrome 123.0.6312.123 (Official Build) (x86_64)
URLs (aka web addresses) of any relevant observations or pages:
Screenshots of what you are seeing:
Photo 1:
Photo 2:
Photo 3:
Description of problem:
- Searching for observations of subtribe Megacephalina in California includes some observations of Omus californicus, which is instead within subgenus Platychilina. Searching for observations of Platychilina includes the remaining observations of Omus californicus (473 total observations of O. californicus, 80 appear under Megacephalina, 393 appear under Platychilina). I don’t know if it is relevant, but the Megacephalina query appears to include only observations from three or more years ago, while the Platychilina query includes both recent and older observations. Clicking on the observations link under either subfamily query brings you to the set of ALL Omus californicus observations in California, not just those that show up under that subfamily query.
Step 1: Query search results on the Explore page for subtribe Megacephalina in California (Link 1). Search result includes some observations of Omus californicus.
Step 2: Query search results on the Explore page for genus Omus in California (Link 2). Search result includes all observations of Omus californicus.
Step 3: Query search results on the Explore page for subtribe Platychilina in California (Link 3). Search result includes observations of Omus californicus not included under Megacephalina.