How do I find the internal taxon this error is referring to? [image] OK, found it from the https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_framework_relationships page with appropriate filter.

You shouldn’t be creating a framework for a taxon with a different external taxon name than the internal taxon…? If POWO has the taxon set as a synonym, you should make a taxon change and add the TFR to the proper name.

Hi I accept your reply but the issue here appears to be iNat users’ unwillingness to accept the taxonomy currently promoted by POWO. See here for a discussion of the differences in opinion.

There is a lot of information in that flag lol… either way, the external and internal taxon names should generally be the same… The only reason it would be different is if you are creating a deviation of a certain type. I would check with the curators involved in the flag before creating a framework…

It looks properly set up, but it is a duplicate so you would have to delete or change the old one. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/429183/taxonomy_details I’ve never seen such a complex tree before so I’m not sure exactly how it works, but it looks like you’re trying to add a relationship for som…

Wow, that is certainly complex.

Shouldn’t each species have its own relationship rather than being in this huge one? E.g. since Lobivia aurea goes with Echinopsis aurea , there should be a simple deviation relationship that just has L. aurea > E. aurea. Right now if I click on the Taxonomy Details button on the species page of an…

There are only two small things I don’t understand here: All cactus taxonomy. iNat’s taxonomic inner workings. Other than that, this is all perfectly clear…but, boy, does my head hurt. ;-)

Maybe because the deviation is at the subfamily level it’s easier to make one than a bunch for all the species? I don’t know a ton about this but @loarie made it so I assume it’s done well. [image] gcwarbler: iNat’s taxonomic inner workings. This isn’t exactly the inner workings but here’s m…

You can find it by searching on Taxon Framework (Tracheophyta) and the External Taxon name (Echinopsis formosa korethroides) on the <a href="https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_framework_relationships?utf8=%E2%9C%93&filters%5Bmatch%5D=0&filters%5Balternate_position%5D=0&filters%5Bone_to_one%5D=0&filters%5Bmany_to_many%5D=0&filters%5Bmany_to_one%5D=0&filters%5Bone_to_many%5D=0&filters%5Bnot_external%5D=0&filters%5Bnot_internal%5D=0&filters%5Btaxon_framework_id%5D=10&filters%5Btaxon_name%5D=&filters%5Btaxon_id%5D=&filters%5Bexternal_taxon_name%5D=Echinopsis+formosa+korethroides&filters%5Binternal_rank%5D=&filters%5Bexternal_rank%5D=&filters%5Buser_id%5D=&filters%5Bis_active%5D=">taxon framework relationships index page As an aside, I personally think taxon framework relationships work great for managing a small number of minor deviations from …

The huge horticultural interest in cacti has indeed created many differences of opinion regarding their taxonomy. Hence the extensive discussion in the flag I linked earlier. The TFR created by @loarie was built through discussions between the two of us over a couple of weeks but now needs some addi…

Taxon Framework Relationship error

Curators

mrtnlowr November 24, 2021, 6:09pm 17

I agree it’s one half of the TFR. I hope to get the iNat half using the API /taxa endpoint (21 pages), converting json to csv online, importing to SQLite and linking the two tables on genus+species+infra

Topic		Replies	Views
Curators: Guide to Taxon Framework Relationships Curators	16	1218	February 18, 2020
Changes in how taxon framework relationships work? Curators	4	458	April 17, 2020
Taxon name in internal taxa bar invisible when creating new Taxon Framework Relationship Bug Reports	0	71	June 26, 2024
Taxon Framework Relationship pages title is missing Bug Reports	6	368	January 25, 2020
A gentle plea when adding new taxa: add taxon framework relationship Curators	9	1125	June 12, 2019

Taxon Framework Relationship error

Related topics