Platform (Android, iOS, Website): Website
Browser , if a website issue (Firefox, Chrome, etc) : Opera, Chrome
(note that numbers will keep going up a little when you check this later)
Go to explore, and filter to Date Added, end date of 30/11/23. You get this
Now do the same thing, but untick verifiable only, so that casual observations are also included. We now get this
it isn’t possible for the number of species to be lower for the larger pool, yet somehow…
(and by more than 1000 as well!!)
1 Like
pisum
December 1, 2023, 11:47am
22
1 Like
thanks, I’ll reopen and merge
pisum:
my initial hypothesis was maybe that some observations were getting classified as casual, thereby dropping the count of species for all verifiable observations.
here’s what i see for all verifiable observations :
and this is what i see for all observations , including casual:
i would have expected the species count in the second set to be greater than in the first set. but that’s not the case. so then there must be some sort of weird indexing issue.
as per my post above, this issue has cropped up again
1 Like
I tried going through some of the iconic taxa to see if it applies to all iconic taxa and did not observe it for plants, mammals, birds, or “unknowns”.
tiwane
December 1, 2023, 7:29pm
26
Thanks, I let our devs know.
tiwane
December 15, 2023, 11:53pm
27
Should be fixed now, but will probably happen again in about a year. We have to increase the ceiling every so often.
Solution: stop observing so many species! ;-)
5 Likes