When trying to ID a new observation, it’s very helpful to start by saying what basic group an observation might belong to (i.e. plant, animal, fungus). In a few circumstances, however, this can be really tough. Traditional projects can be a way around this: by adding observations for a few types of hard-to-categorize observations, we can help gather experts on hard-to-distinguish taxa.
I wanted to highlight three examples:
- I just created a traditional project “Aquatica” ( https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/aquatica ) for underwater organisms anywhere in the globe that might not follow typical body plans or be in familiar and easily-distinguished base taxa. This might include for example seaweeds / bryozoans / worms.
- I previously created a traditional project “Slimes/Molds” ( https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/slime-molds-ea454c31-6fc9-46db-94e9-912a7fd456b3 )” for things that are ambiguously bacteria, slime molds, or fungi.
- A project for generally quirky organisms can be found at “WeirdWildWonders” ( https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/weirdwildwonders ).
Are there other similar examples where a traditional project might be helpful to get hard-to-categorize species IDed? How can we make them more salient?
Finally, I’d like to include a reminder of an old effort: a wiki on guides to IDing animals by clade and region, https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/observing-identifying-wildlife-wiki/15332 .