What is the difference among these three categories?

Bordered Apamea Moth and Allies Section Apamea sordens

https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1330111-Apamea-sordens

Bordered Apamea Moth and Close Allies Complex Apamea sordens

https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1330128-Apamea-sordens

I think I figured out that the Close Allies complex (1330128) also includes Apamea anceps and Apamea alpigona.

Bordered Apamea Moth Apamea sordens

https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/213859-Apamea-sordens

2 Likes

Based on the taxonomy page - it appears that this particular genus (Apamea) has multiple levels to it. Based on my experience on iNat, some genuses have a lot of species in them, and so are divided into sections (which is the first item in your list).

Then there are some species that are often difficult to tell apart from each other. That’s where the “complex” comes in. For instance, in the Arisaema genus, there is a “complex” for several species of Jack in the pulpit plants that often cannot be distinguished easily/are closely related.

The third one in your list is the actual species.

Hope that helps.

2 Likes

Sections aren’t usually used in animal taxonomy, and in plant taxonomy I believe they are just one word/name unlike the binomial here. So these sections look like informal species groupings to me, in which case they wouldn’t be that different from complexes and might not really make sense for iNat.

3 Likes

I don’t see any flags discussing it and I haven’t checked any literature, but it’s likely a recognized species group in the literature and was implemented following this recommendation:

“Bordered Apamea Moth and Close Allies Complex Apamea sordens” Includes sordens and digitula, which are externally identical and only separable based on dissection.

“Bordered Apamea Moth and Allies Section Apamea sordens” includes the sordens-group as defined on page 49 of the Apamea fascicle:

https://images.peabody.yale.edu/mona/26-9-ocr.pdf

3 Likes