This discussion has gone a little off topic. We’re discussing a single user who has shown a pattern of deliberately misusing the DQA system to keep observations from being rightfully marked casual. This is not a place for the airing of general grievances over the lack of IDs provided for observations marked casual. (These grievances are also not relevant to this case as most of the problematic observations I am discussing have IDs and some are even research grade as a result of the improper “wild” flag.)
@anon83178471 has taken on notifying staff about this user. A flag exists for the improper hiding of @mertensia’s comment. And moderator notes (only visible to curators) about these issues have been added to their profile.