This little one isn’t exactly camouflaged, but it tried… note that the wing colors perfectly match the brick and cement of the wall it landed on! Labrador Carpet (Xanthorhoe labradorensis).
This is Actenodes undulatus, a type of Jewel Beetle. I count myself as lucky to have spotted one – there are only 19 Observations on iNaturalist and I think it is because despite being lightly metallic and of a decent size, the coloration and patterning makes them disappear onto the woods into which they bore. (This one nearly did so into leaf litter.)
What were you thinking? Probably that IDers would identify the tree instead of the moth. And then you’d need to get three other IDers to agree with you, instead of just one. So, good idea.
Far from questioning the red circle, some of us (with eyesight that isn’t what it used to be) thank you for it!
The Acrida ungarica was photographed in central Italy, the Truxalis nasuta in Crete. I believe there is an overlap in the distribution, but I’m not an expert, so don’t take my word as gospel!
In general, which strategy offers an organism more protection: great camouflage, or great mimicry? Or is this too full of variables to be considered a worthwhile question to even ask?
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/233889356
Almost missd this Pale Oak Beauty hiding on the ground. Well camouflaged even though the middle of the trail is a weird hiding place for a moth… the ‘hiding in plain sight’ technique :)
We have some flounders like that here in Alaska. They’re mostly transparent and live in shallow pools. As soon as they are startled they dive into the sand and disappear from sight. I have yet to get a picture of one.