A lil pet peeve that when you hover over the image area on Identify, it fades a little. Can this be removed? [image] There’s also little need to fade back the “reviewed” observations, since there’s already a prominent checkmark indicating the observations have been reviewed. Fading them back make…

@taitsougstad : redesigning the Account Settings page is certainly on the to-do list. Everyone: mousing over the images in the Identify modal (the pop-up) shouldn’t fade them any more. Please do some testing.

[image] taitsougstad: because @bouteloua should pretty much get whatever she asks for dang, as much as I don’t think anyone should get “special treatment”, I actually can’t object to that! More a case of “always asks for sensible stuff…”

however, I kinda like the greyed out reviewed images. Makes it much clearer what still needs to be looked at. After doing a page, I can glance and see easily what sort of “ratio” I was actually able to review, before hitting the review all! It is a nuisance when flicking over the toggle to see revie…

I like the fade on mouse-over as well as on reviewed observations. If people want it removed, I would appreciate it being an option that you can toggle (if that is not too cumbersome to code). It’s not a huge deal but I thought it was a great feature when I started using iNat and I still find it u…

[image] jgw_atx: I like the fade on mouse-over as well as on reviewed observations. Would you be OK with another sort of visual indicator, like a border? I’m personally not a big fan of the “fade” on mouseover, but I’ve learned to live with it. I can’t say I understand not wanting observatio…

I could understand fading the thumbnails on the default filter (which is reviewed=false), but not when it’s reviewed=true. I’m ambivalent about reviewed=any. Maybe the text could stay faded though?

A border or a cut-off corner would be a good compromise. It also wouldn’t get in the way of the thumbnails no matter what reviewed= is set to.

yes… a very obvious red border would be a good indicator, solid enough to be apparent to those that are colour blind, but not so solid as to negatively impact the thumbnail.

Sounds like a good opportunity to try a few options to toggle in users settings and trim whatever doesn’t get used.

The Account Settings are already pretty messy and we don’t want to keep adding to it. I think it’s good to have options there for really important privacy/license/language stuff, but I’d like to minimize it for smaller things.

That’s fair. Digression Alert: From a design perspective, it seems to work the best when most useful (ie. most used) options are clean and organized in the Settings front page, and then the nitpicky little details are hidden in an “advanced” section. This allows users to find all of the important s…

Don't "fade" images on Identify

Feature Requests

tiwane July 20, 2019, 6:54pm 33

Yes, we’re not going to remove fading from the reviewed thumbnails. I’ll close this.

Topic		Replies	Views
Increase thumbnail size on Identify Feature Requests	15	3520	April 16, 2020
Agree button on Identify thumbnails General	42	5346	October 28, 2019
Add number of photos to thumbnails on Identify page Feature Requests web	19	2085	May 15, 2019
"Mark as a reviewed" is the most confusing UI element in the iNat interface, it could use better tooltips Feature Requests	3	673	July 20, 2020
Small, Potential Feature Requests General	41	1361	February 14, 2025

Don't "fade" images on Identify

Related topics