When compiling a list of observations in a “place of interest”, is there a way to exclude “obscure” obs since there is no way to know for certain if they occur within the boundary of the “place of interest” Thanks for any help

Add &geoprivacy=open to your search url Compare https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=90295&subview=grid&geoprivacy=open which has 34,465 records vs https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=90295&subview=grid which has 34,729 note the place in this example is a park of almos…

i think the reason you want to filter out obscured observations in this case may need to be reexamined.

@bbk-htx - just to clarify what this means: obscured records can be excluded from a place search if their obscuring boundary box (the roughly 22*22 km box around the actual location that is generated) goes outside the place records whose obscuring boundary box covers a place but which are not actu…

I need to find observations that are actually on a small beach in a natural area. It’s very frustrating to only be able to see all the obscured observations!

Filter to exclude "obscured" observations

General

Topic		Replies	Views
Search option for my private and obscured observations General question	2	294	January 26, 2021
Keyword Search of my Observations does not include "Obscured" Observations General question	3	385	June 12, 2020
Hiding obscured/private locations Feature Requests	3	1008	March 27, 2019
Include taxon_geoprivacy in search filters Feature Requests web , search	6	1250	May 6, 2019
Create Filter by Location Accuracy Feature Requests	22	4164	March 7, 2019

Filter to exclude "obscured" observations

Related topics