Issue: Many people don’t like stumbling across observations of dead organisms.
Solution: Such observations can be annotated as Dead so that people can screen them out. Some people may be interested in doing that annotation step.
Issue: It is typically difficult to find such observations given the large background of living-specimen observations.
Solution: Figure out ways to find un-annotated deceased-specimen observations, to label them. This is a wiki for that, currently a stub.
Potential approaches:
Some existing projects may focus on dead specimens
Some existing observation fields may flag dead specimens in different ways
Some users’ tags may flag dead specimens
Some users’ description fields may describe specimens as dead
There are lots of projects that have dead animal observations, is that the kind of thing you’re looking for? In theory, you can filter out obs from those projects, but filtering them all out via a single annotation filter is definitely easier.
Yep! Above, relevant projects could be added as listings or something like that. It’s truly a stub so structure of potential listings is TBD right now.
Could the above projects could be rolled into an umbrella project? Annotations could then be done on that project from identify without having to go to each project.
I annotate for dead, but alive is something I think is just assumed if the dead annotation is not set. It just feels super wrong to be marking annotations of “alive”, unless it is something that is playing dead but very much alive…
I feel that if I’m annotating an observation anyway and the subject is alive, I should annotate it as alive. I don’t go out of my way to do it, though. I do usually make a point of annotating as dead the observations of dead mammals and birds (and sometimes other vertebrates) that I see. At least that’s my theory. In practice? Oh, well.