Edit: Maybe it should be genre?
I love stupid!
Saw a new one today. Although I don’t think I’ve seen many actual bugs under rocks. I’d rather this be a log…
A bit silly and funny, like all good memes
agree so much…
I like wasps and spiders and it’s kind of sad to see “kill it with fire” directed at any picture of a wasp or spider, or just any arthropod all the time. Once I was watching a video of YouTube about Megarhyssa ichneumonid wasps and someone commented “so gross, I killed one in my house the day before!” even though they are harmless and quite rare…
BTW, this also applies to weevils (Curculionoidea, Coleoptera), they are often described as pests but the vast majority of species feed on wild plants.
And very ikely thata person killed something totally different, because they couldn’t see the different between totally different insects.
That’s possible too.
This has to be one of the funniest because it is true
I’ve seen that so much! You could be forgiven with the Muscovy though, it’s such a strange-looking duck! I thought it was a duck-chicken when I first saw one.
Ahh But when you rase the camera to your eye it has gone
tbf I am always impressed by bird folk ability to ID off of shody photos. Including mine since I dont have a birding lens. Just posted a kingfisher tonight, I figured out genus, but in minutes of being on iNat it is confirmed 2 ID’s at species.
Yeah, I have seen that kind of 2 minute response too with the feathered ones. But then I thought, if you compare the number of bird species in any given locale at a given time, the list of choices is relatively tiny compared to say, most of the invertebrate or green world.
I think this explains the expediency of most mammal IDs too.
So with limited choices, even god-awful focus and pixel shortage can still be enough to work.
Absolutely dying at the moth complementing the bright screen.
In offense of splitters:
Based on an actual honest-to-god true story:
Why, yes, I do make all my memes in MS Paint. How did you know?
Source: reddit