I was having a hard time finding an observation of mine I was looking for in the Identify search, and stumbled across this issue. It may extend earlier than 2017, but that’s when my earliest observation uploads happened.
According to the My Observations list, between Jan 1 2017 and Feb 7 2018, I created 1633 observations:
However, when I go to the Identify tab and do a search for the same time period (filters set to include any quality grade, any reviewed status, any place ID), I get exactly 2 results - and one of those only started to appear after I unmarked and re-marked its cultivated status (the manzanita).
I’ve noticed that sometimes I’ll ID every observation of a species in my county, and then a few weeks later there’ll be more observations of that same species, supposedly posted years ago, that didn’t appear in my original search. I’m thinking that issue may be related to this one, and older observations just don’t always show up for some reason.
I recreated your links (just to have it clear) and they’re working the same as you describe them. I did the same with mine but another period (and had to go for shorter one), all observations were shown.
I’d say regular id tab is wroking weird too, the order of “last updated” sometimes is ridiculous and newer observations go after many hundreds of old ones where nothing could be changed recently.
I did a bit more fiddling around, and removed all the date restrictions on my observations. Seems a lot of the affected ones are in that range, but not all.
Either way, that’s over 3,000 observations that nobody can identify for me because they don’t show up in searches… I really hope I don’t have to manually go through them all and mark/unmark as “not wild” on every one just to make it appear.
Ooh interesting - a few days ago someone apparently accidentally flagged my user account as spam and then restored it. I have a suspicion that may have caused this somehow.
Not to worry, it was bound to happen to someone eventually, and at least this way it gets noticed and hopefully resolved :) I think it’s a bug - as I understand it, flagging a profile as spam shouldn’t affect observations from that profile unless the observations themselves are also flagged - @tiwane can you confirm if my understanding is correct here?
And that’s assuming that IS even the cause, it could be just coincidental and caused by something else entirely.
If an account is flagged as a spammer, their observations can be found in Explore and, if one is logged in, the individual observations can be viewed. If one isn’t logged in, one can’t view a spammer’s individual observations.
Can they also be found in Identify?
Presently I have 30,804 verifiable observations available in Identify and 33,985 in Explore
EDIT: If I locate one of the missing observations and change the DQA in some way, like marking and then unmarking as “cultivated” it starts to reappear in identify searches. Is there some way that can be accomplished without me having to go through 30k+ observations to find them and fix them?
You can search for a spammer’s observations in Identify but none of them will appear.
EDIT: talking it over, it’s likely that allowing observations from an account flagged as a spammer to show up in Explore is probably an oversight. We’ll probably end up restricting that.
I’m pretty sure we can get those reindexed, I’ll ask our devs to be sure, though.