I look almost exclusively at plants, so my comment applies to plant observations only.
I seem to be forever marking questagame observations or cultivated flowers as not wild, and many of them seem to show as a large rectangle (exact location obscured?). Many are marked unknown, yet the notes underneath might have the organism correctly identified.
Is there a better way to deal with the relatively high proportion of relatively useless observations? Messaging questagame to please add as much information as they might know (for example mark the observation as plant or animal) seems pointless as the message would not get to the observer (or would it?).
There also seem to be a relatively high proportion of totally unidentifiable observations. I am mindful that Questagame might be a good way to get young naturalists involved, and so I’m reluctant to criticise them, but is there a better way to deal with this class of observation than to mark ‘no’ under ‘evidence of organism’? Again, I presume feedback on individual observations would not make it to the observer. Am I wrong?