I am interested in finding a way to conduct the search for defined open spaces and projects in map view instead of just using the search field. I often browse observations by a defined area that isn’t easy to conduct with a simple square or circle selection. Defining open spaces and projects is not only a bit complicated, I wouldn’t want to duplicate someone else’s efforts. Does this method exist? A way to view the map to see where existing public projects and open spaces are instead of using keyword searches? TIA
if you can conceptualize your search as a search for places that encompass a particular point, i think the most reliable way to do this in most cases is to find (or create a temporary dummy observation) at a point that should be encompassed by potential places of interest, and then look at the (geographic) “Details” in the website’s observation detail page to find a list of Encompassing Places.
for example:
there is also the “Places of Interest” feature in the web version of the Explore screen, but because it’s not operating on a single point, it’s harder to control exactly which area you want to search:
finally, i don’t think there’s a way to search for projects on a map, but you can sort of do a search akin to the “places of interest” search via the API (although projects aren’t always consistently and neatly defined geographically like places would be). for example: https://jumear.github.io/stirfry/iNatAPIv1_projects?lat=29.76994&lng=-95.42941&radius=1000&per_page=50
ok, I have never noticed the encompassing places/community curated before. So whether that user was a member of those projects or not, it shows what community project/spaces that particular species was eligible for.
the encompassing places are divided into 2 types:
- standard places that were created by iNat staff: continents, countries, states, counties (and their equivalents), as well as certain other kinds of places like national parks in the USA and some USA towns, too.
- community-created places (everything else).
you have to make a distinction between the concept of places and projects, as they are not the same thing. places in iNat define a particular geographic area. projects attempt to group together observations in a logical way. you can define a project to collect observations based on a particular place, but you don’t need to define a project that way, and the configurations you make on a project associated with a particular place apply only to the project (and the observations in the place), not to the place.
whether a user was a member of a project, generally, the encompassing places summary will show what places a particular observation falls within. the main caveat here is related to observations with obscured or private geoprivacy applied. if a particular user grants project curators access to the underlying true locations of such observations, then those project curators who have been granted special access via a project may see information slightly different from other users who do not have such access.
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

