Screenshots of what you are seeing (instructions for taking a screenshot on computers and mobile devices: https://www.take-a-screenshot.org/):
Description of problem (please provide a set of steps we can use to replicate the issue, and make as many as you need.):
OK, so this is pretty funny, but apparently if the only photo of an organism (in this case), or maybe any taxon photo(?) is flagged for copyright, the taxon photo then shows as the copyright infringement warning logo:
I would suggest that a copyright infringing photo be automatically dropped as a taxon photo or that the selector should show the next photo in the queue or something like that.
This is not something that may happen often enough to deserve a custom feature in my opinion. Any user can edit taxon pictures, I just removed the one in question.
When a taxon doesn’t have any observation, the first uploaded picture automatically becomes the taxon picture, it’s what happened here. Taxon pictures for less observed taxa needs curation in general because as more observations are made more better quality pics become available
I realize that it’s possible to edit the taxon photo manually, but in situations like this with bug reports, it is often better to leave the issue until staff has a chance to see it if needed.
I don’t think it’s necessary for users to speculate about whether a bug is worth fixing or not when making a decision to report it. Staff are best positioned to make judgments about how much effort it will take to address a report and whether it is worth their time to fix any given bug. However, if bug reporters self-censor, staff may never find out about bugs that they would prefer to fix.
